On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:45:27PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > > A GCC 4.5.0 release candidate is available at: > > > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5.0-RC-20100406/ > > > > Please test the tarballs and report any problems to Bugzilla. > > CC me on the bugs if you believe they are regressions from > > previous releases severe enough to block the 4.5.0 release. > > > > Thanks, > > Richard. > > > > -- > > Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> > > Novell / SUSE Labs > > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746 - GF: > > Markus Rex > > > > Richard, > Any chance we can get r157822 reapplied on gcc 4.5 branch > along with... > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00129.html > > to fix emutls? As can be seen from the testsuite run on > x86_64-apple-darwin10... > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-04/msg00444.html > > when all the "dg-require-effective-target tls_native" tests > are converted to "dg-require-effective-target tls", we only > see failures in... > > FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c scan-assembler tcc1@ > FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c scan-assembler tcc2@ > FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c scan-assembler-not tcc...@] > FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c scan-assembler-not tcc...@] > FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/section-1.c conflict with user-defined section (test for > errors, line 12) > > at -m32 and... > > FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/section-1.c conflict with user-defined section (test for > errors, line 12) > > at -m64. Iain thinks the gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c failures are expected > but the gcc.dg/tls/section-1.c failure might be showing up a > previously unknown bug in emutls.
Not before the 4.5.0 release. Richard.
