On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:45:27PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > > A GCC 4.5.0 release candidate is available at: > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5.0-RC-20100406/ > > Please test the tarballs and report any problems to Bugzilla. > CC me on the bugs if you believe they are regressions from > previous releases severe enough to block the 4.5.0 release. > > Thanks, > Richard. > > -- > Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> > Novell / SUSE Labs > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746 - GF: Markus > Rex >
Richard, Any chance we can get r157822 reapplied on gcc 4.5 branch along with... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00129.html to fix emutls? As can be seen from the testsuite run on x86_64-apple-darwin10... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-04/msg00444.html when all the "dg-require-effective-target tls_native" tests are converted to "dg-require-effective-target tls", we only see failures in... FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c scan-assembler tcc1@ FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c scan-assembler tcc2@ FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c scan-assembler-not tcc...@] FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c scan-assembler-not tcc...@] FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/section-1.c conflict with user-defined section (test for errors, line 12) at -m32 and... FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/section-1.c conflict with user-defined section (test for errors, line 12) at -m64. Iain thinks the gcc.dg/tls/opt-4.c failures are expected but the gcc.dg/tls/section-1.c failure might be showing up a previously unknown bug in emutls. Jack
