Patrick Horgan <phorgan1 <at> yahoo.com> writes: > Since it would be hard to read this any other way, it seems then you- > maintain that you found a bug in the standard, has it been brought up to- > the committee? The latest draft I see still has that wording. Doesn't- > seem to be on the radar for C1x.
I strongly agree that the standard should be brought into line with common practice, and that if this is not currently on the committee's radar someone with connections should raise the issue to them. Josh
