> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The GCC source tree is getting really big. We currently have in gcc/: > > > > - 337 .c files > > - 171 .h files > > > > Personally, I think the source tree is quite a mess, the way it is > > now. A long time ago (I can't find the threads involved) there was > > some discussion about re-ordering the source tree a bit. > > > > Now that GCC uses subversion, we can move files around without > > destroying the file revision history, right? And we are in stage1, the > > perfect time for Big Changes like re-ordering the source tree. > > > > Thoughts on what the source tree could look like (crude, eventual > > re-ordering is of course a pre-file decision): > > - c-* go to gcc/c (including c-common.*, 29 files) > > Agreed. > > > - *.h go to gcc/include > > Ugh. I don't like this, nor ... > > > - ipa-* go to gcc/ipa-opt/ipa > > - tree-* go to gcc/gimple-opt/ > > - RTL optimizations (fwprop, see, gcse, loop-*, etc.) go to gcc/rtl-opt/
Hmm, also note that we will probably end up with relatively few passes having both gimple and IPA variant, like IPA-SRA or pure-const pass does have now. Otherwise I am all for directory structure just hope pretty-ipa will get merged before all the renaming happens ;)) Honza
