Kirill Kononenko wrote:
> Do I understand it correctly that there are no useful thoughts or
> ideas with-out- flaming and flooding about LLVM?

  I will admit that I don't have any ideas, but I thought there were a couple
of positive suggestions in there.

  It's possible there's a bit of "library fatigue" going on.  GCC does seem to
keep sprouting new ones!

    cheers,
      DaveK

Reply via email to