Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Personally, what I'd like to see is a clear justification of why a > license change motivated by plugins needs to be on a branch that will > never have plugins. There has been already a plugin branch or two for a > while, obviously with the old license, and the FSF said nothing.
Surely that's got to be because a development branch that never leaves the
repository does not have the same status as an official release?
cheers,
DaveK
