On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:25:34AM -0700, Richard Guenther wrote: > The topmost sentence should be unambiguous. Yes, the SC asked us not > to branch.
The request came from RMS, the SC just passed it on.
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Paolo Bonzini
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13... Jack Howarth
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13... Diego Novillo
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13... NightStrike
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13... Joseph S. Myers
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13... Joel Sherrill
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Dave Korn
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Richard Guenther
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Dave Korn
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Joe Buck
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Daniel Berlin
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Andrew MacLeod
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13... Diego Novillo
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) David Edelsohn
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13... Daniel Berlin
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13... David Edelsohn
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13... Dave Korn
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13... Daniel Berlin
- Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13... Richard Kenner
