On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 13:50, Joseph S. Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> As plugin-centric enhancements as described seem to be changes to existing > GCC source code (providing infrastructure of potential use to multiple > plugins), they don't have a single plugin-name, so the path you gave > doesn't make sense as a path within the GCC source code. It might make > sense for a path within the GCC source code to plugins distributed with > GCC, however. Yes, that's the path I was describing; plugins distributed with GCC. I don't expect we'll have more than a small number of them. Mostly as examples. > As for installation directories, I've already noted that plugins should be > installed under libsubdir or libexecsubdir since they will depend on both > the target and version of GCC. Agreed. We'll also need some convention for the API header files. Diego.
