Diego Novillo wrote on 09 October 2008 14:27:

> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 05:26, Hugh Leather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>   I think the env var solution is easier for people to use and
>> immediately understand.  There would be nothing to stop those people who
>> don't like env vars from using the shell wrapper approach.  Why not
>> allow both? 
> 
> Environment variables have hidden side-effects that are often hard to
> debug.  It is easy to forget that you set them.  

  And they presumably break ccache's determinism.

> I also agree that we
> should not allow environment variables to control plugins.

  I think it's best if the compiler's generated output is solely determined by
the command line and the pre-processed source, so I'm with this side of the
argument.


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

Reply via email to