Diego Novillo wrote on 09 October 2008 14:27: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 05:26, Hugh Leather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I think the env var solution is easier for people to use and >> immediately understand. There would be nothing to stop those people who >> don't like env vars from using the shell wrapper approach. Why not >> allow both? > > Environment variables have hidden side-effects that are often hard to > debug. It is easy to forget that you set them.
And they presumably break ccache's determinism. > I also agree that we > should not allow environment variables to control plugins. I think it's best if the compiler's generated output is solely determined by the command line and the pre-processed source, so I'm with this side of the argument. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....