> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 10:14:38AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote: >> That human is me, and I'm once again behind on almost everything.
I can relate. :-( >> I'll try to get to that soon. Thanks for the reminder that the >> results are useful. > > Here are a couple to start off the results page: > > 1) x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, on an RHEL4 system + FSF binutils 2.17 > + MPFR 2.3.1. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-08/msg02717.html > (looks like I messed up and didn't get the 32-bit tests I intended, > I'll see about fixing that). > > 2) sparc-sun-solaris2.8 + GNU as/GNU ld (FSF 2.17) > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-09/msg00007.html > (a number of visibility failures). > > The old systems in our porting center (Alpha, HPPA, SGI-Irix, etc) > are gone, so I can no longer test those systems. I still have Alpha around .. not sure if this is the sort of thing you want access to for testing. Last time I checked it was a dual proc 4000 series machine with Windows NT on it. Yes .. really. :-P -- Dennis Clarke
