Doug Gregor wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In particular, design. The using bits seem pretty straightforward. It
would be nice if you could provide some detail in terms of scope (what
are the algorithms or data structures you intend to instrument),
and how this fits into the existing debug mode functionality. Do you
need the debug mode functionality, or are just piggy-backing off this
existing structure?
This ties in with the main question I had... typically, a profiling
layer is used on larger inputs where it is important that the
profiling code itself have very low overhead. Piggybacking on the
debug mode is a definite performance-killer, so I hope that the
profiling version of the library will be in its own inline namespace
alongside the parallel and debug modes.
Agree. We will create a new namespace at the same level as the parallel
and debug modes.
My vote for the command-line switch is -fprofile-stdlib.
Agree.
- Doug
Thank you,
Silvius
