On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:14 PM, J.C. Pizarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008/3/13, Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > J.C. Pizarro wrote: > > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:44:29 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > > >> The engineers currently are not listed in the FSF copyrights > > >> assignment file. > > >> > > >> David > > > > > > Why they've to be listed in FSF copyrights assignment file? > > > > > > Intel released original x86 hardware. > > > AMD released original x86-64 hardware. > > > > > > Intel cloned AMD's x86-64 hardware calling it x64. > > > AMD cloned Intel's x86 hardware doing it compatible. > > > > > > The software on hardware needs the hexadecimal specification > > > of the hardware for the working of this pair software-hardware. > > > It's the ASM description of the hardware. > > > Otherwise, this pair won't work without knowledge of the hardware. > > > > > > The problem is when it will start that the hardware company want > > > not to transfer its copyrights of hardware documents to software > > > organization because the hardware company wants to live of the > > > businesses of licenses and copyrightes, and of the lawyers > > > against any software organization who didn't dealed with it. > > > > > > I don't understand how it's made the U.S. law. I'm paranoid in it. > > > > > > I did read IBM suitcases in around 198x about the separation of > > > hardware-software. Wintel cases too. > > > > > > J.C.Pizarro > > > > > > This is complete nonsense, I suggest you do a bit > > of homework before sending messages to this list, > > which are entirely off topic anyway. > > $ grep -iR "intel\.com" . | sed 's/^[^<]*<\([^>]*\)>.*$/\1/g' | sort -u > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > $ > > Are they listed in FSF copyrights assignment file?
yes. > > J.C.Pizarro >
