On 2008/3/13, Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > J.C. Pizarro wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:44:29 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > >> The engineers currently are not listed in the FSF copyrights > >> assignment file. > >> > >> David > > > > Why they've to be listed in FSF copyrights assignment file? > > > > Intel released original x86 hardware. > > AMD released original x86-64 hardware. > > > > Intel cloned AMD's x86-64 hardware calling it x64. > > AMD cloned Intel's x86 hardware doing it compatible. > > > > The software on hardware needs the hexadecimal specification > > of the hardware for the working of this pair software-hardware. > > It's the ASM description of the hardware. > > Otherwise, this pair won't work without knowledge of the hardware. > > > > The problem is when it will start that the hardware company want > > not to transfer its copyrights of hardware documents to software > > organization because the hardware company wants to live of the > > businesses of licenses and copyrightes, and of the lawyers > > against any software organization who didn't dealed with it. > > > > I don't understand how it's made the U.S. law. I'm paranoid in it. > > > > I did read IBM suitcases in around 198x about the separation of > > hardware-software. Wintel cases too. > > > > J.C.Pizarro > > > This is complete nonsense, I suggest you do a bit > of homework before sending messages to this list, > which are entirely off topic anyway.
$ grep -iR "intel\.com" . | sed 's/^[^<]*<\([^>]*\)>.*$/\1/g' | sort -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Are they listed in FSF copyrights assignment file? J.C.Pizarro
