On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:27 PM, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 12:47 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > We will never use git exclusively as long as it requires as many > > workflow changes for people as it currently does. This is not me > > speaking for the gcc community, this is me telling it like it is based > > on experience moving us to svn. > > Even simple things, like having to do git diff -rHEAD instead of git > > diff to see added files, etc. > > Regardless of how fast it is, until the UI is something people don't > > have to think about to work with, it's not going to fly. > > Surely you jest? Isn't GCC using something really weird at the moment > like Subversion?
If by "really weird" you mean "nobody has any real complaints about the way it works and are happy it is close to what they were using before", then yes, they are using something "really weird".
