ah great. that should work. can you tell me the equivalent of install-gcc,too? Thanks.
On 10/03/2008, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:57:21AM +0100, Jonas Meyer wrote: > > I gave it a couple more tries and I'm still pretty sure that make > > all-gcc was the correct way to do it. After all all the toolchain > > creating scripts I looked at like openwrt,buildroot and crosstools do > > it that way. > > make all fails while configuring libmudflap - telling me the c > > compiler couldn't create executables. Probably because the libc is not > > yet there. I'm building on x86_64 for a i486-linux-uclibc target. > > I could try building for i486-linux-glibc but I'm sure that wouldn't > > change anything about this problem. > > How should I go on about this problem? > > > If you just want to build just gcc and libgcc, not any other target > libraries, do > make all-gcc && make all-target-libgcc > ah great. that should work. can you tell me the equivalent of install-gcc,too? Thanks.
