On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:57:21AM +0100, Jonas Meyer wrote:
> I gave it a couple more tries and I'm still pretty sure that make
> all-gcc was the correct way to do it. After all all the toolchain
> creating scripts I looked at like openwrt,buildroot and crosstools do
> it that way.
> make all fails while configuring libmudflap - telling me the c
> compiler couldn't create executables. Probably because the libc is not
> yet there. I'm building on x86_64 for a i486-linux-uclibc target.
> I could try building for i486-linux-glibc but I'm sure that wouldn't
> change anything about this problem.
> How should I go on about this problem?
If you just want to build just gcc and libgcc, not any other target
libraries, do
make all-gcc && make all-target-libgcc
Jakub
