On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:30:46PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Joe Buck wrote: > > > > > I suggest just letting 4.3.0 out into the world (finish the release > > > process), and mention the caveat about the cld issue in the announcement. > > > We would then have time to decide whether to do a quick 4.3.0.1, or not. > > > > It certainly does need finishing (e.g. the Bugzilla parts of > > releasing.html). I think we can just do an early 4.3.1 with whatever > > other fixes are ready on the branch rather than making a special 4.3.0.1; > > it's not as if 4.3.0 (or any .0 release) is going to be a widely deployed > > stable release with people wanting one fix and just that one fix. > > Sounds good to me; certainly as soon as 4.3.0 gets out and gets wider > testing, people will find things. In the past we only used the 4th digit > for paper-bag issues (like failure to bootstrap on a major platform or > broken release tarballs).
Heh, we even did a quick 3.2 release after fixing ABI issues in 3.1. Richard.
