On Jan 30, 2008 7:55 PM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But the current xgcc in gcc 4.3 building issue the warning yet.
Yes because the header defines NULL incorrectly. Which was the whole issue in the first place. -- Pinski
On Jan 30, 2008 7:55 PM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But the current xgcc in gcc 4.3 building issue the warning yet.
Yes because the header defines NULL incorrectly. Which was the whole issue in the first place. -- Pinski