But the current xgcc in gcc 4.3 building issue the warning yet.
2008/1/31, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Jan 30, 2008 7:38 PM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > See: http://www.linuxonly.nl/docs/2/0_Page_1.html > > > It says: > This is because NULL is not of the right type: it is defined as > integer 0 instead of a pointer with the value 0. > > Except that is wrong from what the C99 standard says about the NULL macro: > The macros are > NULL > which expands to an implementation-defined null pointer constant > > So no casting is needed as it is already a pointer type if we follow > the C99 standard (I think C90 says the same thing except I don't have > C90 in front of me). > > Thanks, > > Andrew Pinski >
