On Dec 17, 2007, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/17/07 15:28, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >>> You need to provide such a document now. >> >> Can't I instead provide it when it's ready?
> Of course. Thanks, Now, since you're so interested in it and you've already read the various perspectives on the issue that I listed in my yesterday's e-mail to you, would you help me improve this document, by letting me know what you believe to be missing from the selected postings on design strategies, rationales and goals: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00229.html (goals) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00160.html (initial plan) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00261.html (detailed plan) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00317.html (example) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00590.html (more example) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00176.html (design rationale) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00177.html (clarification) I could then focus on these missing aspects too, in addition to the ones I already have, while designing the best form to present the ideas. Thanks in advance, -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org}
