On Nov 24, 2007, Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> And then, despite the consensus that GCC must not generate different >> code with and without -g, the patch that fixes one such regression has >> been lingering for months, and the patch that introduced the >> regression hasn't been reverted either.
> Pointers? Regression introduced here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01745.html first reported here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00127.html last proposed patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00608.html -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org}
