On Nov 24, 2007, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 24, 2007, Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Alexandre Oliva wrote: >>> And then, despite the consensus that GCC must not generate different >>> code with and without -g, the patch that fixes one such regression has >>> been lingering for months, and the patch that introduced the >>> regression hasn't been reverted either.
>> Pointers? > Regression introduced here: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01745.html > first reported here: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00127.html > last proposed patch here: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00608.html I take it back that this patch wasn't approved. Mark had approved it on Nov 5, I didn't want to check it in before going on a trip and, when I returned, I forgot about the approval because it was in an unrelated thread. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00139.html I'll shortly check in that one and a bunch of others that also got approval but that I deferred until my return. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org}
