Razya Ladelsky wrote: > Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/11/2007 01:51:33: > > >> Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Janis Johnson wrote: >>> >>>> -fipa-cp steven >>>> -fipa-matrix-reorg razya >>>> -fipa-pure-const zadeck (enabled with -O) >>>> -fipa-reference zadeck (enabled with -O) >>>> -fipa-type-escape zadeck >>>> -fvar-tracking-uninit ctice >>>> >>>> > > I'll add documentation for ipa-cp and ipa-matrix-reorg as soon as > Zadeck commits his changes to invoke.texi. > > Thanks, > Razya > > > >>>> Is there a policy about whether an experimental option can be left >>>> undocumented, or should it be documented with a statement that it is >>>> experimental? >>>> >>> I'd prefer the latter. >>> >> I believe our policy to be that *all* command line options must be >> clearly documented. The document can say that the option is >> experimental, deprecated, or otherwise in danger of being removed or >> changes, but we should document the option. >> >> If an option is only useful for developers, and we really think that >> users should not be allowed to twiddle it, we should hide it under an >> #ifdef. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Mark Mitchell >> CodeSourcery >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> (650) 331-3385 x713 >> > > i am waiting for an approval, hint hint hint.
Kenny
