Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/11/2007 01:51:33: > Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Janis Johnson wrote: > >> -fipa-cp steven > >> -fipa-matrix-reorg razya > >> -fipa-pure-const zadeck (enabled with -O) > >> -fipa-reference zadeck (enabled with -O) > >> -fipa-type-escape zadeck > >> -fvar-tracking-uninit ctice > >>
I'll add documentation for ipa-cp and ipa-matrix-reorg as soon as Zadeck commits his changes to invoke.texi. Thanks, Razya > >> Is there a policy about whether an experimental option can be left > >> undocumented, or should it be documented with a statement that it is > >> experimental? > > > > I'd prefer the latter. > > I believe our policy to be that *all* command line options must be > clearly documented. The document can say that the option is > experimental, deprecated, or otherwise in danger of being removed or > changes, but we should document the option. > > If an option is only useful for developers, and we really think that > users should not be allowed to twiddle it, we should hide it under an > #ifdef. > > Thanks, > > -- > Mark Mitchell > CodeSourcery > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (650) 331-3385 x713
