Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Janis Johnson wrote: >> -fipa-cp steven >> -fipa-matrix-reorg razya >> -fipa-pure-const zadeck (enabled with -O) >> -fipa-reference zadeck (enabled with -O) >> -fipa-type-escape zadeck >> -fvar-tracking-uninit ctice >> >> Is there a policy about whether an experimental option can be left >> undocumented, or should it be documented with a statement that it is >> experimental? > > I'd prefer the latter.
I believe our policy to be that *all* command line options must be clearly documented. The document can say that the option is experimental, deprecated, or otherwise in danger of being removed or changes, but we should document the option. If an option is only useful for developers, and we really think that users should not be allowed to twiddle it, we should hide it under an #ifdef. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713