On 10/22/07, Jason Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Miller wrote: > > > But wouldn't you agree that it's not all that great to ship a new > > feature in GCC that users have already found ways to ICE? > > Oh, absolutely, it's just not a regression.
Except it is still ICEing. There was a discussion before (I cannot find it right now) that made the following considered a regression: anything to ICE (even after an error, though not a blocking one) works to wrong code rejects invalid to accepts valid accepts invalid to rejects valid diagnostic regressions And there was a previous discussion about setting the priority too (the release manager is the only one who should be setting it too). Thanks, Andrew Pinski
