On 9/24/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is exactly what I had in mind. If you invalidate a property then > the property is destroyed and whoever asks for it must invoke the > relevant function to enable it again. Is that a problem?
In principle, I don't think that'd be a problem. There will be surprises lurking, though. Also, I haven't thought whether this would be any simpler or easier to use than the current scheme. I guess I don't mind either way.
