On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:50:13PM +0200, J.C. Pizarro wrote: > 2007/7/25, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:32:33PM +0200, J.C. Pizarro wrote: > >> Patch it to investigate it a little bit more. > >> > >> After runned it, see "quickdirty.log" and post here your report's > >summary. > > > >No, please do not. This is not the libelf list; use that list. > > Dear Joe, > > why not? > > It's more meaningful to see this kind of related information than to > divert it to nowhere.
I didn't say to divert it to nowhere. I said to divert it to the libelf developers' list (or the libelf help list). We do the same when there's an issue with binutils, or glibc. Use the correct list. I gave a pointer earlier in the thread.
