Cat-4 wrote:
>
> $ ls -lad gcc*
> 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2007-06-21 12:35 gcc-4.1-4.1.1ds2
> 6956 -rw------- 1 root root 7109677 2006-12-11 06:02
> gcc-4.1_4.1.1ds2-21.diff.gz
> 4 -rw------- 1 root root 2407 2006-12-11 06:02
> gcc-4.1_4.1.1ds2-21.dsc
> 36156 -rw------- 1 root root 36982690 2006-10-21 23:17
> gcc-4.1_4.1.1ds2.orig.tar.gz
>
> Which gives us:
>
> gcc-4.1_4.1.1ds2.orig.tar.gz - the original source
> gcc-4.1_4.1.1ds2-21.dsc - a description of the package
> gcc-4.1_4.1.1ds2-21.diff.gz - debians modifications to the original
>
I get something like this. I assumed that the patches were preapplied, or do
you have to patch the diff file to the orig extracted archive?
I ask, because I'm getting this error again:
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.so when searching
for -lc
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/../lib/libc.a when searching for
-lc
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/bin/../lib/libc.so when searching
for -lc
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/bin/../lib/libc.a when searching for
-lc
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.so when searching for -lc
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.a when searching for -lc
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Which I believe disappeared before when using the --disable-multilib option,
but the main reason I'm building this way is so I don't have to use that
flag (my impression is using that flag disables the ability to compile
different architectures/platforms on the local machine -- I assumed one of
the patches would rectify this matter, or is the previously mentioned patch
not used by [some] debian distros?)
If nothing else, if someone can answer, I would like a confirmation that the
provided packages should be preapplied to the source package.
I guess in the meantime I'll go ahead and install it and see if I can use it
or not. I'd appreciate it if someone can point me to the Debian amd64
multilib patch that was said to exist if it shouldn't be included in the
repository patches.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/I%27m-sorry%2C-but-this-is-unacceptable-%28union-members-and-ctors%29-tf3930964.html#a11226604
Sent from the gcc - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
