michael.a wrote:
>
> Will likely be a good while before I can report whether simply knocking
> out the errors cause any run-time issues.
Is there some reason why stdarg.h would not be on my system (amd64 ubuntu)
I can find it in the various gcc source trees (apparently gcc brings its
own) ...is it safe to just copy that one? I'm assuming it belongs in
/usr/include.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/I%27m-sorry%2C-but-this-is-unacceptable-%28union-members-and-ctors%29-tf3930964.html#a11242651
Sent from the gcc - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
