Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?

[Mike Stump]

On Mar 23, 2007, at 6:08 AM, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
When I brought up the 16-bit option earlier, Jakub replied that x86  
would
get hosed worse because it's 16-bit accesses

I'm happy to have experts make predictions.  I'm happy to look at  
real numbers to double check things.  If an expert can predict what  
we could measure to show us getting hosed, I'd be happy to run that  
test.

I assume you tested on Darwin?

Yes.

Can you tell me if it was ppc or x86?

2.66 GHz x86.