"Kaveh R. GHAZI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > And we don't want to arm our detractors with bad SPEC numbers. I can just > imagine the FUD spreading... we've got to fix it or backout.
For me as a gcc user miscompilations are far worse than bad SPEC numbers. I never run SPEC, but if my programs are miscompiled I am in deep trouble. I expect many other people to feel similar. Broken programs are infinitely worse than slower programs. If you really have any detractors(?) they will get much more meat out of miscompilations than out of any SPEC numbers. I find it amazing that this needs stating. -Andi
