On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:23:14PM -0500, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote: > No it doesn't need stating, at least not for me. :-) Sure nobody likes > bugs/miscompilations, but all compilers have them. We evaluate how > serious they are and whether a performance hit from a bug fix is worth it. > My understanding is that 4.1 has this very same bug, and it hits about as > often as it does in 4.2. See the end of this message: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-02/msg00432.html > > If so, then it can't be too bad IMHO. That was the context within which > I made my statement. And if that holds, I continue to stand by it.
On the other hand, I consider this a fairly serious bug in 4.1 (and I've seen customers encounter it at least twice off the top of my head). It depends what your tolerance for wrong-code bugs is. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery
