> I know Andrew replied privately, but I hope he doesn't mind me raising > the issue on-list. I just wanted to guage the general feeling as to > whether I'd screwed up, and whether I should have submitted the patches > in a different way.
I guess one should rather thank you for taking time to split patch into well described pieces! I think it actually is good way for allowing good review of bigger merge. Perhaps it would make sense to hold patches that depend or earlier or are similar in nature to those already posted so the changes requirested during review can be applied to them without too many re-posts, but I tend to believe that many patches are a lot better than single big merge patch doing many different changes. Honza
