Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I just wanted to apologise for something that Eric brought up...
Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I know Andrew replied privately, but I hope he doesn't mind me raising >> the issue on-list. I just wanted to guage the general feeling as to >> whether I'd screwed up, and whether I should have submitted the patches >> in a different way. > > The only problem I personally have is that you apparently successively > replied > to the previous post, which means that all the patches are tied to a single > gigantic thread in my mailer. :-( Yeah, sorry about that. I'd wanted to keep all the messages in the same thread so that folks could kill the thread in one go if they weren't interested. But what I should have done was make each patch a reply to the introductory message instead. So that's one lesson learnt. Richard