Thanks to everyone for the feedback.  I just wanted to apologise for
something that Eric brought up...
Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I know Andrew replied privately, but I hope he doesn't mind me raising
>> the issue on-list.  I just wanted to guage the general feeling as to
>> whether I'd screwed up, and whether I should have submitted the patches
>> in a different way.
>
> The only problem I personally have is that you apparently successively 
> replied 
> to the previous post, which means that all the patches are tied to a single 
> gigantic thread in my mailer. :-(

Yeah, sorry about that.  I'd wanted to keep all the messages in the same
thread so that folks could kill the thread in one go if they weren't
interested.  But what I should have done was make each patch a reply
to the introductory message instead.  So that's one lesson learnt.

Richard

Reply via email to