> > > > Are 4.0 snapshots still necessary? I suspect they should be > > > > discontinued. > > > > > > 4.0 still seems to be regarded as an active branch. > > > > > > I don't mind closing it, myself. Does anybody think we should have a > > > 4.0.4 release? > > > > I'd like to see it closed. We have some bugs that are only open because > > they are targeted for 4.0.4 (fixed on all branches but 4_0). > > I'd like to see it closed, too, all Linux/BSD vendors I know of are either > still using 3.x or have switched to 4.1 already.
Hi, User chiming in: before retiring 4.0, one would be more easily convinced to make a transition to 4.1+ if the regressions from 4.0 to 4.1 numbered fewer. In the database, I see only 79 (P3+) regressions in 4.1 that are not in 4.0 (using only summary matching). Will these get a bit more attention for the upcoming 4.1.2 release? http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/query.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=4.1&known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&gcchost=&gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&gcctarget=&gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&gccbuild=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDED&bug_status=WAITING&bug_status=REOPENED&priority=P1&priority=P2&priority=P3&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&query_based_on=4.1%20%5C%204.0%20regressions&negate0=1&field0-0-0=short_desc&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=4.0&field0-1-0=noop&type0-1-0=noop&value0-1-0= Fang
