> > [ omitting gcc-patches ] > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Joe Buck wrote: > > I'd like to see it closed. We have some bugs that are only open > > because they are targeted for 4.0.4 (fixed on all branches but 4_0). > > If there is consensus, I'll be happy to take the appropriate steps, > which include: > > 1. Updating our web pages > 2. Sending a notification to the gcc list > 3. Running a final snapshot (so that we have a tarball matching > the head of that tree) > 4. Stopping the snapshot mechanism > > How about waiting ten days, say, see whether anyone has substantial > objections, and proceed as noted above? (We are usually operating > on Internet time, but giving people more than a week is fair, I think.)
I am willing to be the release manager for 4.0.4 if nobody else steps up to the base for this. Thanks, Andrew Pinski
