On 6/15/06, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Right, but Manuel was commenting on Mike Stump's proposal, wondering > >why Mike proposed to run the bootstrap tests *after* reviewer approval > >instead of before.
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 07:12:38PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > It might be a question of resources, though I agree that it makes sense > to do it before patch review. Like testing on all primary release > platforms - which makes resources more of a problem, as it is not simply > throwing a bunch of cheap boxes at the problem this way. Well, maybe we should decide on what is a primary release platform based at least partly on who will make adequate testing resources available for GCC testing. Skilled people are a more valuable resource than hardware is.
