On 6/15/06, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 01:03:17PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 06/15/06 05:34:
>
> > I mean, there is a patch queue, you put your patch or patch
> > set in the queue, it gets bootstrapped and tested as you said on 2-5
> > patforms, then either it passes and a notification is send to the
> >
> Actually, the patch queue only stores the patches. This idea of
> bootstrapping on 2-5 platforms automatically has not been implemented.
Right, but Manuel was commenting on Mike Stump's proposal, wondering
why Mike proposed to run the bootstrap tests *after* reviewer approval
instead of before.
It might be a question of resources, though I agree that it makes sense to do
it before patch review. Like testing on all primary release platforms - which
makes resources more of a problem, as it is not simply throwing a bunch
of cheap boxes at the problem this way.
Richard.
