On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:03:26AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just realized that the installation of libgcc_s.so.1 in "make install" > is done like this > (builfing gcc-4.0.3 on Solaris 8 / Sparc): > > /bin/sh ../../gcc-4.0.3/gcc/../mkinstalldirs /tmp2/gcc_4.0/lib/sparcv9; > ginstall -c -m 644 sparcv9/libgcc_s.so.1 > /tmp2/gcc_4.0/lib/sparcv9/libgcc_s.so.1; rm -f > /tmp2/gcc_4.0/lib/sparcv9/libgcc_s.so; ln -s libgcc_s.so.1 > /tmp2/gcc_4.0/lib/sparcv9/libgcc_s.so > > There is explicitely mode 644 used - in contrast to all other libs > (libstdc++.so*, libgfortran.so*),
The other libs are libtool libs and are installed differently from libgcc_s.so. Look at gcc/mklibgcc.in in the source directory and gcc/libgcc.mk in the build directory. > which are installed with 755 permissions. As a consequence, executables > that are linked with > libgcc_s.so.1 are not able to load it, even if the RUNPATH > (-R/path/to/libgcc) or > LD_LIBRARY_PATH are defined correctly. Are you _sure_? We don't have a problem on a Solaris 8 system with libgcc_s.so, mode 644, with either GCC 3.4.3 or 4.0.2. What error are you getting? -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
