Dorit Nuzman wrote:
Well, gen-vect-11.c was taken from some vect-*.c test that I don't remember -- probably one that Kazu failed, and that's why I proposed adding -fwrapv. It's your test as much as mine. :-)I am pretty sure that adding -fwrapv will fix the problem, but that means we are changing the test case.gen-vect-11.c is Paolo's test, so it's his call I guess (he already agreed to add -fwrapv - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg00579.html)
Paolo