Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 16/01/2006 18:56:52: > Dorit Nuzman wrote: > > >>I am pretty sure that adding -fwrapv will > >>fix the problem, but that means we are changing the test case. > >> > >> > > > >gen-vect-11.c is Paolo's test, so it's his call I guess > >(he already agreed to add -fwrapv - > >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg00579.html) > > > > > Well, gen-vect-11.c was taken from some vect-*.c test that I don't > remember -- probably one that Kazu failed, and that's why I proposed > adding -fwrapv. It's your test as much as mine. :-) >
so this testcase is probably covered by some vect-*.c test, so either solution is fine with me! dorit > Paolo
