On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:32:51PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 02:13:05AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > > | Have -Wuninitialized be a very simple detector, which is either in the > > front-ends > > | or in the middle-end so it could be shared (just like -Wunused). > > | Have -Wuninitialized=2, be the current -Wuninitialized. > > > > That is backward. Have -Wuninitialized means whatever it means today. > > Agreed. We don't want it to change much; people who use -Wall -Werror > will be particularly pissed off if gcc produces new, but bogus, warnings > for uninitialized variables (please feel free to produce new, but *valid*, > warnings).
People who use -Wall -Werror are _already_ pissed off about -Wuninitialized. It virtually guarantees that your build will fail on a new release of GCC. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC