On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 07:17:06PM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > Very true, but I don't think that's an execute to generate even more > false positives for them! :-)
I disagree. The point of this set of warnings is that they would be _simple_ and _consistent_. Less likely to change across releases, and easier to predict and explain to non-compiler-hackers. If the option was available, I'd switch GDB over in a heartbeat. Or at least propose it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC
