On Oct 26, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:48:57AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2005-10-26 12:39:31 -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
But in a way you are defending it as you want GCC to change. If
there
was any other reason besides ASCII art, some people would be more
willing
to change but there is a simple fix person's code to get around
this issue.
And that is by not using C++ style comments and just use C style
ones.
Adding a line
//
just after the ASCII art would be even easier.
Eureka!
Yup. I've mentioned it. Boy have I mentioned it. :)
However, the "this is a small implementation defined issue that's
easy to change for users that are migrating from other compilers"
issue remains.
-eric
