On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 17:40 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Giovanni Bajo wrote: > > >I'll add others: > > > >I would also notice that most people don't RTFM. I spent many efforts in > >writing the Wiki page, and the benefits of SVN are apparent if you spend > >some time reading it and studying the thing a little. To make things better, > >something *has* to change. You can't expect SVN to be *identical* to CVS, > >but it's very very close. > > > > > Agreed, many thanks both to you and Steven. > > Only one request from me: before the switch takes place, can you make > sure the instructions on the wiki are sufficiently complete and > incorporate all the latest advices about performance and so on? I think > this is an high priority and would even suggest delaying the switch if > we don't have those docs ready.
Well i guess i should aks the harsh question, which is, are these advantages enough for you guys, or should we just not move? Again, there are invariably some pains associated with any switch in workflow :)
