On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 05:18:26PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > On 10/19/05, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 05:12:32PM +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote: > > > > Most of this is ssh overhead, because your diff is so small. > > > > > > I disagree, the diff isn't small, it is of a typical/reasonable size I > > > would say. > > > > > > > The ssh multiplexing stuff just written up on the wiki should help. > > > > > > Thanks, I will have a look. This requires an update to OpenSSH >= 4.0, > > > so I cannot test that right now. > > > > Or, use the svn protocol instead for read operations? I believe you > > can do this using svn switch. > > svn should probably be told to do that automatically for read operations, > if available. It will also take some load off the server for not > doing handshaking > and encryption.
I admit that'd be a pretty slick feature. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC
