> Out of curiosity, are you comparing anonymous CVS versus svn+ssh? In that
For your curiousity, no. I am comparing two write-access repositories (CVS and svn+ssh). > case, it's apple and oranges. Do some ssh multiplexing and get speed back. I first need to update to openssh 4.0 which will take some time... But indeed, if this single change gets speed comparable to cvs, I'll be reasonably happy. The main issue is really with svn status and the handling of versions and branches which seems to be quite different and quite disruptive for cvs users. > "svk" is a tool that lets you mirror the entire repository (or a subset of), > checkout many copies from your local mirror, diff whatever with whatever, > commit into your local repository, and finally push changes into the > official repository. I believe it's going to be very handy for the average > GCC developer. People are still discussing about it (see other mails) and I > believe a Wiki page will be setup about it. Thanks. I'll wait for the outcome of this discussion. So far, it's not clear that svk will fit well in my set up. Arno
