On Wed, Nov 20, 2024, 3:50 PM Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 04:11:16PM -0500, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote: > > I merged libdiagnostics to GCC trunk on Monday: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/libdiagnostics > > > > Unfortunately I've since discovered there's at least one libdiagnostics > > .so already in Debian: > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/diagnostics > > > https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libdiag&mode=filename&suite=unstable&arch=any > > > > so I've been asked to change the name. > > > > I'd prefer to avoid having "gcc" in the name. > > > > Some name ideas: > > > > * libdiag > > * libgdiagnostics (where we can be ambiguous about what the "g" stands > > for) > > * libgdiag (less typing) > > * libcomplain > > * libcomplaint > > * libwhining > > * libwhine (but sounds like the Windows compat software) > > > > Any ideas? > > Cool, a naming bikeshed! My suggestion[s] would be some variant of: > > [lib][g](code|lang)diag[nostics] > > Have fun picking a color! :) > <sarcasm>Shouldn't "not the Debian version" be encoded? </sarcasm> Sorry. Couldn't resist. > > Cheers, > > Mark >
