Hi Joseph, On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 03:54:51PM GMT, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 8 Nov 2024, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > > Hi Thorsten, JeanHeyd, > > > > I've just checked that JeanHeyd opened a survey about the name. > > It's here: <https://thephd.dev/the-big-array-size-survey-for-c>. > > Thanks for the survey, JeanHeyd; It's a fair one. (The only thing I > > miss is anouncing it to some relevant publics, but I guess I'm doing it > > now, so that's ok.) Would you mind sharing provisional results before > > Nov 18? That's the cut-off date for having this feature in GCC 15. > > If you don't want to publish provisional results for fear of influencing > > other voters, you could share them in private. > > I don't consider such survey results to be of any relevance to reviewing a > GCC patch. The basis for review now is what's in C2Y now (which the > proposed patch does not follow). If a name change is accepted in Graz > (possibly taking into account survey results at that point), that's the > point at which it's relevant for GCC.
Fair enough. For now, I keep it for GCC 16. Adding _Lengthof now to GCC 15 may jeopardize my attempt to rename it in Graz, so I'll play my cards. If I see survey results that don't seem good for my renaming attempts, I may reconsider and send _Lengthof next week; but for now I have some hope. :-) BTW, I'm nevertheless going to rebase my patch, to test with the changes that Martin did to arrays of 0 elements. I may send another revision of the _Countof patch set, just for having it in the list, but you can just ignore it. Have a lovely night! Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
